Among the “5 ways that Spurgeon coped with the London terror attacks” (all of them very good, BTW), should not one of them have been resistance? The author mentions two instances of Spurgeon’s confrontation of violence against himself. Is that not a bit telling? (Spurgeon was a famous British Baptist preacher, but he didn’t much like the name Baptist. Can’t blame him.)

http://www.spurgeon.org/resource-library/blog-entries/5-ways-spurgeon-coped-with-londons-terror-attacks